GeForce 830A vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce 830A

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce 830A vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 830A vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 830A vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 830A

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 160W, a 127W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 1147.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 384% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 11.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 384.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1147.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1831% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 1,173), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce 830A is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 384% (56.8 vs 11.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 830A vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 830A

The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 830A scores 1,173 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1831%. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 2535 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 830AGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
1,173
22,651+1831%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
256
4352+1600%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS+3647%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
2535 MHz+120%
ROPs
8
48+500%
TMUs
16
136+750%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
4.3 MB+3208%
L2 Cache
1 MB
32 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 830A does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 830A is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce 830AGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 830A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 830A and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 830A) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 830AGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
288 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
32 MB+3100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 830A) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 830AGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce 830A) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 830A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce 830AGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder
NVENC 3.0
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VP6
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 131.6% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 830AGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP
33W-79%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
Legacy
8-pin
Length
0mm
240mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
35.5
141.6+299%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 830A came in at $100, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce 830A was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.7 (GeForce 830A) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 385.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 830AGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP
$100-75%
$399
Performance per Dollar
11.7
56.8+385%
Codename
GM108
AD106
Release
July 22 2014
May 18 2023
Ranking
#832
#59

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.