GeForce 830A vs Radeon R9 M265X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 830A vs Radeon R9 M265X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 830A vs Radeon R9 M265X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 830A

2014

Why buy it

✅19.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 101% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.7 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M265X

2014

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 830A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 11.7 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 830A is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,173 vs 1,167), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 830A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 830A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 101% (11.7 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 830A vs Radeon R9 M265X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 830A

The GeForce 830A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,173 points.

Radeon R9 M265X

The Radeon R9 M265X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 21 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 830A scores 1,173 and the Radeon R9 M265X reaches 1,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 830A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M265X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 830A) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M265X). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830A) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M265X). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 625 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 830A	Radeon R9 M265X
G3D Mark Score	1,173	1,167
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	640+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5888 TFLOPS	0.8 TFLOPS+36%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+84%	625 MHz
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 830A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M265X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 830A	Radeon R9 M265X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 830A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M265X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M265X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 830A and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M265X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 830A) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M265X) — the GeForce 830A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 830A	Radeon R9 M265X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 830A draws 33W versus the Radeon R9 M265X's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 830A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 830A) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M265X). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce 830A	Radeon R9 M265X
TDP	33W-56%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	35.5+128%	15.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 830A came in at $100, while the Radeon R9 M265X launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce 830A was 50% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.7 (GeForce 830A) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 M265X) — the GeForce 830A offers 101.7% better value.

Feature	GeForce 830A	Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP	$100-50%	$200
Performance per Dollar	11.7+102%	5.8
Codename	GM108	Venus
Release	July 22 2014	March 21 2014
Ranking	#832	#839

Search GeForce 830A on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M265X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.