GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce Go 7700

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 GS

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce Go 7700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce Go 7700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce Go 7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400 GS

2014

Why buy it

  • 26.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 230W, a 197W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce Go 7700

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 8400 GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
  • 597% higher power demand at 230W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 8400 GS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 10.1% in PassMark G3D (163 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 8400 GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400 GS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce Go 7700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400 GS

The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 versus the GeForce Go 7700's 148 — the GeForce 8400 GS leads by 10.1%. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7700 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1085 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce Go 7700
G3D Mark Score
163+10%
148
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
3.333 TFLOPS+286%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+4%
1085 MHz
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
16
128+700%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce Go 7700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 GS and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 7700) — the GeForce 8400 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce Go 7700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce Go 7700
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0c
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400 GS) vs No (GeForce Go 7700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700).

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce Go 7700
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the GeForce Go 7700's 230W — a 149.8% difference. The GeForce 8400 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce Go 7700
TDP
33W-86%
230W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
170mm
0mm
Height
106mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-24%
85°C
Perf/Watt
4.9+717%
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 8400 GS (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 8400 GSGeForce Go 7700
MSRP
$30
Codename
GM108
GK104
Release
March 17 2014
May 30 2013
Ranking
#850
#398

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.