
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce Go 7700

GeForce 8400 GS
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 8400 GS is positioned at rank #461 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400 GS
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7700.
| Insight | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8400 GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 GS and GeForce Go 7700

GeForce 8400 GS
The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

GeForce Go 7700
The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 versus the GeForce Go 7700's 148 — the GeForce 8400 GS leads by 10.1%. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7700 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163+10% | 148 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 3.333 TFLOPS+286% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+4% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 128+700% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 7700) — the GeForce 8400 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400 GS) vs No (GeForce Go 7700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the GeForce Go 7700's 230W — a 149.8% difference. The GeForce 8400 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-86% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 0mm |
| Height | 106mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9+717% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400 GS is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | GM108 | GK104 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #850 | #398 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















