
GeForce 8400 GS

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400 GS
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $569 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.
- ✅Measures 170mm instead of 304mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅4985.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 727.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.
- ❌78.8% longer card at 304mm vs 170mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400 GS vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 GS
The GeForce 8400 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 GS scores 163 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 16414.7%. The GeForce 8400 GS is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163 | 26,919+16415% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 5888+1433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+3277% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 2475 MHz+120% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 16 | 184+1050% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 5.8 MB+2953% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 36 MB+3500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 8400 GS does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 8400 GS is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400 GS has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 GS and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 36 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12.2+22% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 GS draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 8400 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-84% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 304mm |
| Height | 106mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 1-67% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 134.6+2647% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400 GS came in at $30, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce 8400 GS was 95% cheaper ($569 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (GeForce 8400 GS) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 731.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 GS | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-95% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 44.9+731% |
| Codename | GM108 | AD104 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #850 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














