
GeForce 8400M G vs FirePro 2260

GeForce 8400M G
Popular choices:

FirePro 2260
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400M G is positioned at rank 635 and the FirePro 2260 is on rank 360, so the FirePro 2260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2260
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 2260 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.6% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M G.
| Insight | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+3100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 2260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 2260 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 43.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+43.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400M G and FirePro 2260

GeForce 8400M G
The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

FirePro 2260
The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M G scores 105 versus the FirePro 2260's 113 — the FirePro 2260 leads by 7.6%. The GeForce 8400M G is built on Maxwell while the FirePro 2260 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 512 (FirePro 2260). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105 | 113+8% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+12% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M G comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 2260 has 4 GB. The FirePro 2260 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 2260) — the GeForce 8400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 4 GB+3100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 10.1 (FirePro 2260). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 8400M G) vs UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G) vs MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD 1.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M G draws 33W versus the FirePro 2260's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 8400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M G) vs 350W (FirePro 2260). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2+113% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400M G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 2260 launched at $129 and now averages $15. The FirePro 2260 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 7.5 (FirePro 2260) — the FirePro 2260 offers 41.5% better value. The GeForce 8400M G is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M G | FirePro 2260 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-61% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 7.5+42% |
| Codename | GM108 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 12 2014 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #854 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















