GeForce 8400M G
VS
FirePro 2260

GeForce 8400M G vs FirePro 2260

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M G

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS

FirePro 2260

2012Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400M G is positioned at rank 635 and the FirePro 2260 is on rank 360, so the FirePro 2260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G

#624
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5170%
#626
4687%
#627
4674%
#631
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4250%
#632
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4221%
#634
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
100%
#635
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#636
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#638
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#639
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#641
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#642
94%
#643
GeForce 9300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#644
GeForce 9500 GS
MSRP: $110|Avg: $10
93%
#645
91%
#646
Mobility Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#647
GeForce 8500 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
90%
#648
GeForce 9500 GT
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
90%
#649
Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2260

#345
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
16788%
#360
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#361
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
100%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
98%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
92%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
91%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
91%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
90%
#368
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
89%
#369
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
89%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
81%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
77%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
75%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
74%
#374
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
69%
#375
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
69%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 2260 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.6% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M G.

InsightGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-7.6%)
Leading raw performance (+7.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+3100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro 2260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 2260 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 43.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+43.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400M G and FirePro 2260

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M G

The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

AMD

FirePro 2260

The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M G scores 105 versus the FirePro 2260's 113 — the FirePro 2260 leads by 7.6%. The GeForce 8400M G is built on Maxwell while the FirePro 2260 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 512 (FirePro 2260). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
G3D Mark Score
105
113+8%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+12%
0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8400M G comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 2260 has 4 GB. The FirePro 2260 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 2260) — the GeForce 8400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
4 GB+3100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 10.1 (FirePro 2260). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
DirectX
11.1+10%
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 8400M G) vs UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G) vs MPEG-2 (FirePro 2260).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
Encoder
PureVideo HD
UVD 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD
UVD 1.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M G draws 33W versus the FirePro 2260's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 8400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M G) vs 350W (FirePro 2260). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
3.2+113%
1.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8400M G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 2260 launched at $129 and now averages $15. The FirePro 2260 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 7.5 (FirePro 2260) — the FirePro 2260 offers 41.5% better value. The GeForce 8400M G is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GFirePro 2260
MSRP
$50-61%
$129
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$15-25%
Performance per Dollar
5.3
7.5+42%
Codename
GM108
Cape Verde
Release
March 12 2014
June 13 2012
Ranking
#854
#732