GeForce 8400M G
VS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce 8400M G vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M G

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 8400M G is positioned at rank #635 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G

#624
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
5170%
#626
4687%
#627
4674%
#631
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4250%
#632
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4221%
#634
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
MSRP: $899|Avg: $400
100%
#635
GeForce 8400M G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
100%
#636
GeForce 8400M GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
#637
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
99%
#638
GeForce 9100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#639
GeForce 9600M GT
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#640
GeForce 8300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#641
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#642
94%
#643
GeForce 9300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#644
GeForce 9500 GS
MSRP: $110|Avg: $10
93%
#645
91%
#646
Mobility Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#647
GeForce 8500 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
90%
#648
GeForce 9500 GT
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
90%
#649
Mobility Radeon X1600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
111%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
110%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
110%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
110%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
109%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
109%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
107%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
105%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
104%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
104%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
104%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
103%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
102%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
101%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
101%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
100%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
98%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
98%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
96%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
95%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
94%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
93%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
92%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
92%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
91%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
91%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
90%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
89%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8400M G lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 29974.3% higher G3D Mark score and 9500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M G.

InsightGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-29974.3%)
Leading raw performance (+29974.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (285mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 919.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce 8400M G.

InsightGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+919.5%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400M G and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400M G

The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M G scores 105 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 29974.3%. The GeForce 8400M G is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2610 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
G3D Mark Score
105
31,578+29974%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
7680+1900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
40.09 TFLOPS+4544%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
2610 MHz+132%
ROPs
8
80+900%
TMUs
16
240+1400%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
7.5 MB+3847%
L2 Cache
1 MB
48 MB+4700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce 8400M G lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8400M G comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 9500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
12 GB+9500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
504 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
48 MB+4700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
DirectX
11.1
12 Ultimate+8%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD (GeForce 8400M G) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Encoder
PureVideo HD
NVENC (8th Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo HD
NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400M G draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 158.5% difference. The GeForce 8400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M G) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
TDP
33W-88%
285W
Recommended PSU
350W-50%
700W
Power Connector
Legacy
8-pin
Length
285mm
Height
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
3.2
110.8+3362%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8400M G launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce 8400M G costs 96.6% less ($570 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GeForce 8400M G) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 909.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 8400M GGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP
$50-94%
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$20-97%
$590
Performance per Dollar
5.3
53.5+909%
Codename
GM108
AD104
Release
March 12 2014
January 3 2023
Ranking
#854
#11