
GeForce 8700M GT

Quadro FX 380M
GeForce 8700M GT vs Quadro FX 380M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8700M GT vs Quadro FX 380M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8700M GT vs Quadro FX 380M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8700M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 189W, a 39W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX 380M
2008Why buy it
- ✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌26% higher power demand at 189W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8700M GT vs Quadro FX 380M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8700M GT
The GeForce 8700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 124 points.

Quadro FX 380M
The Quadro FX 380M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 121 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8700M GT scores 124 and the Quadro FX 380M reaches 121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8700M GT is built on G9x while the Quadro FX 380M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380M).
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 124+2% | 121 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8700M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8700M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380M carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 380M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 8700M GT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380M.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 11.1 (FL10_1) (Quadro FX 380M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1 (FL10_1)+11% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8700M GT) vs VP4 (Quadro FX 380M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8700M GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro FX 380M).
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8700M GT draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 380M's 189W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8700M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8700M GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8700M GT | Quadro FX 380M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8+33% | 0.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













