GeForce 8800M GTS
VS
GeForce 7900 GTX

GeForce 8800M GTS vs GeForce 7900 GTX

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 7900 GTX

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7900 GTX

#701
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
13919%
#703
12618%
#704
12585%
#708
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
11444%
#709
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
11365%
#711
GeForce 7900 GTX
MSRP: $499|Avg: $40
100%
#712
GeForce 6800 GS
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
99%
#713
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#714
GeForce 6150
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
94%
#715
RADEON E4690
MSRP: $558|Avg: $558
94%
#716
MOBILITY RADEON X300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
87%
#717
MOBILITY RADEON X700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
86%
#718
Mobility Radeon HD 4225
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
85%
#719
RADEON X800 SE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
83%
#720
MOBILITY RADEON 9700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
71%
#721
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
65%
#722
GeForce 7800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
58%
#723
RADEON 9600SE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $65
54%
#724
Radeon X1200
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
53%
#725
Radeon 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
51%
#726
GeForce 6800
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
49%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 7900 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8800M GTS.

InsightGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce 7900 GTX
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 7900 GTX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce 7900 GTX

NVIDIA

GeForce 8800M GTS

The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7900 GTX

The GeForce 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8800M GTS scores 382 and the GeForce 7900 GTX reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8800M GTS is built on G9x while the GeForce 7900 GTX uses G9x, both on a 65 nm process. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 224 (GeForce 7900 GTX).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce 7900 GTX
G3D Mark Score
382
388+2%
Architecture
G9x
G9x
Process Node
65 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
224
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce 7900 GTX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce 7900 GTX
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7900 GTX). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce 7900 GTX
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0c
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs None (GeForce 7900 GTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo VP1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce 7900 GTX).

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce 7900 GTX
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo VP1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8800M GTS draws 150W versus the GeForce 7900 GTX's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 7900 GTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS) vs 350W (GeForce 7900 GTX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce 8800M GTSGeForce 7900 GTX
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
80-16%
Perf/Watt
2.5
2.6+4%