GeForce 9300 vs GeForce 205
GeForce 9300
Popular choices:
GeForce 205
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300 is positioned at rank 633 and the GeForce 205 is on rank 614, so the GeForce 205 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 205
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 205 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce 205 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 205.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 205 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the GeForce 9300, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300 and GeForce 205
GeForce 9300
The GeForce 9300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points.
GeForce 205
The GeForce 205 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 126 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300 scores 127 and the GeForce 205 reaches 126 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 205 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300) vs 384 (GeForce 205). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 205). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 127 | 126 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 0.7972 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1038 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+33% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce 205) — the GeForce 9300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9300) vs 10.1 (GeForce 205). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9300) vs None (GeForce 205). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9300) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 205).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | PureVideo HD (VP4) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300 draws 33W versus the GeForce 205's 10W — a 107% difference. The GeForce 205 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300) vs 350W (GeForce 205). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 10W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.8 | 12.6+232% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce 205 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The GeForce 205 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.3 (GeForce 9300) vs 8.4 (GeForce 205) — the GeForce 205 offers 33.3% better value. The GeForce 205 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 9300 | GeForce 205 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $50-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.3 | 8.4+33% |
| Codename | GM108 | GP108B |
| Release | March 13 2015 | February 20 2019 |
| Ranking | #810 | #643 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9300 and GeForce 205
