
GeForce 940MX vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

GeForce 940MX
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 940MX is positioned at rank #300 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940MX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 940MX is significantly newer (2016 vs 0). The GeForce 940MX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 940MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake).
| Insight | GeForce 940MX | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Legacy (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 940MX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 940MX and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

GeForce 940MX
The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 940MX scores 1,509 and the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 940MX) vs 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,509 | 1,500 |
| Shading Units | 512+1500% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 940MX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has 0 MB. The GeForce 940MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 940MX draws 23W versus the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)'s 15W — a 42.1% difference. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940MX) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 23W | 15W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 65.6 | 100.0+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 940MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.2 (GeForce 940MX) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 940MX | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | — |
| Release | June 28 2016 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #764 | #776 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















