GeForce 940MX vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 940MX

23

1,509

+0.6%

GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

TITAN V

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

15

1,500

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130T

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 940MX is positioned at rank #300 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 940MX

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

99%

#290

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

719%

#292

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

652%

#293

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

650%

#297

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

592%

#298

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

587%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

100%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

100%

#305

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

99%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

99%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

98%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

97%

#312

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C

MSRP: $99|Avg: $30

94%

#314

GeForce GT 720A

MSRP: $40|Avg: $40

94%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 940MX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 940MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

Insight	GeForce 940MX	UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 940MX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 940MX Benchmark Check

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 940MX and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

GeForce 940MX

The GeForce 940MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,509 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 940MX scores 1,509 and the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 940MX is built on Maxwell while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce 940MX) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Boost clocks: 861 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score	1,509	1,500
Architecture	Maxwell	Gen. 12
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	512+1500%	32
Boost Clock	861 MHz	1450 MHz+68%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 940MX	UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 940MX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has 0 MB. The GeForce 940MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 940MX draws 23W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 42.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 940MX) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce 940MX	UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP	23W	15W-35%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	65.6	100.0+52%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 940MX launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.2 (GeForce 940MX) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).