CPU
GPU
GeForce 9650M GT
Popular choices:
GeForce 6800 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9650M GT is positioned at rank 679 and the GeForce 6800 GT is on rank 728, so the GeForce 9650M GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6800 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9650M GT is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 9650M GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6800 GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 6800 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9650M GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9650M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9650M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 54.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9650M GT and GeForce 6800 GT
GeForce 9650M GT
The GeForce 9650M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.
GeForce 6800 GT
The GeForce 6800 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9650M GT scores 137 and the GeForce 6800 GT reaches 142 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 6800 GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 224 (GeForce 6800 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 137 | 142+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+186% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9650M GT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6800 GT has 256 MB. The GeForce 9650M GT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6800 GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+23% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G96) (GeForce 9650M GT) vs No (GeForce 6800 GT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 6800 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No NVENC (G96) | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9650M GT draws 75W versus the GeForce 6800 GT's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 9650M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 350W (GeForce 6800 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 216mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.8+100% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9650M GT launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce 6800 GT launched at $399 and now averages $40. The GeForce 9650M GT costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (GeForce 9650M GT) vs 3.5 (GeForce 6800 GT) — the GeForce 9650M GT offers 57.1% better value. The GeForce 9650M GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9650M GT | GeForce 6800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-38% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5+57% | 3.5 |
| Codename | GM107 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | October 27 2015 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #671 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9650M GT and GeForce 6800 GT
