GeForce 9700M GT vs FirePro RG220

CPU

GPU

GeForce 9700M GT

2008Core: 500 MHz

FirePro RG220

2013Core: 825 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce 9700M GT

150

327

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

FirePro RG220

150

335

+2.4%

Mobility Radeon HD 5430

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 9700M GT is positioned at rank #668 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9700M GT

#658

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

6620%

#660

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

6001%

#661

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

5985%

#665

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

5443%

#666

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

5405%

#668

GeForce 9700M GT

MSRP: $200|Avg: $40

100%

#669

Mobility Radeon X2500

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

100%

#670

GeForce 9300 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#671

GeForce 9800M GTX

MSRP: $300|Avg: $30

92%

#672

Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $250|Avg: $57

92%

#673

Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Serisi

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

91%

#674

GeForce 505

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

88%

#675

GeForce 9200M GE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

88%

#676

Mobility Radeon. HD 5470

MSRP: $150|Avg: $25

87%

#677

Radeon HD 2600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $40

87%

#678

GeForce 7500 LE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

87%

#679

GeForce 9650M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

84%

#680

GeForce 9650M GS

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

83%

#681

GeForce 8400 SE

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

83%

#682

GeForce 8400M GT

MSRP: $50|Avg: $30

82%

#683

GeForce 9200M GS

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

79%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro RG220 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9700M GT.

Insight	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro RG220 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro RG220 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+104.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 9700M GT Benchmark Check

FirePro RG220 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9700M GT and FirePro RG220

GeForce 9700M GT

The GeForce 9700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 327 points.

FirePro RG220

The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9700M GT scores 327 and the FirePro RG220 reaches 335 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GT is built on G9x while the FirePro RG220 uses GCN 1.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 768 (FirePro RG220).

Feature	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
G3D Mark Score	327	335+2%
Architecture	G9x	GCN 1.0
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	224	768+243%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 10.1 (FirePro RG220). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
DirectX	11.1 (FL10_0)+10%	10.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VP3 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs None (FirePro RG220). Decoder: VP3 vs None.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
Encoder	VP3	None
Decoder	VP3	None
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9700M GT draws 150W versus the FirePro RG220's 150W — a 0% difference. The FirePro RG220 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 350W (FirePro RG220). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs Unknown.

Feature	GeForce 9700M GT	FirePro RG220
TDP	150W	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	Unknown-100%
Perf/Watt	2.2	2.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9700M GT launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro RG220 launched at $0 and now averages $20. The FirePro RG220 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 16.8 (FirePro RG220) — the FirePro RG220 offers 104.9% better value. The FirePro RG220 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).