GeForce 9700M GT vs Radeon E6460

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GT

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon E6460

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9700M GT vs Radeon E6460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9700M GT vs Radeon E6460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9700M GT vs Radeon E6460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9700M GT

2008

Why buy it

  • 15.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 33.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $200 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 32.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 9700M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9700M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (327 vs 324), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9700M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon E6460 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 32.1% (2.2 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon E6460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9700M GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9700M GT vs Radeon E6460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GT

The GeForce 9700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 327 points.

AMD

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9700M GT scores 327 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GT is built on G9x while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTRadeon E6460
G3D Mark Score
327
324
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale 2
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
224
480+114%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9700M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTRadeon E6460
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GT and 64-bit on the Radeon E6460.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTRadeon E6460
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9700M GT draws 150W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTRadeon E6460
TDP
150W
45W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
2.2
7.2+227%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9700M GT came in at $200, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon E6460 was 25% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 2.2 (Radeon E6460) — the Radeon E6460 offers 37.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6460 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTRadeon E6460
MSRP
$200
$150-25%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
2.2+38%
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Turks
Release
July 15 2008
May 2 2011
Ranking
#825
#923

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.