CPU
GPU
GeForce 9700M GT
Popular choices:
Radeon E6460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9700M GT is positioned at rank 668 and the Radeon E6460 is on rank 312, so the Radeon E6460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9700M GT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E6460
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9700M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon E6460.
| Insight | GeForce 9700M GT | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9700M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9700M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9700M GT | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9700M GT and Radeon E6460
GeForce 9700M GT
The GeForce 9700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 327 points.
Radeon E6460
The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9700M GT scores 327 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GT is built on G9x while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 327 | 324 |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 480+114% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9700M GT draws 150W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 45W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 7.2+227% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9700M GT launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 8.1 (Radeon E6460) — the GeForce 9700M GT offers 1.2% better value. The Radeon E6460 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | Radeon E6460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $150-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+1% | 8.1 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Turks |
| Release | July 15 2008 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #825 | #923 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9700M GT and Radeon E6460
