GeForce 605 vs GeForce 9700M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 605 vs GeForce 9700M GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 605 vs GeForce 9700M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 605

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 572.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9700M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 9700M GT

2008

Why buy it

✅42.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
566.7% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9700M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 605 instead at 330 vs 327, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 605 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 65nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 605 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 572.8% (11.0 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce 9700M GT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 605 vs GeForce 9700M GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 605

The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.

GeForce 9700M GT

The GeForce 9700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 327 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the GeForce 9700M GT reaches 327 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 9700M GT uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 224 (GeForce 9700M GT).

Feature	GeForce 605	GeForce 9700M GT
G3D Mark Score	330	327
Architecture	Kepler	G9x
Process Node	28 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	384+71%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 605	GeForce 9700M GT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 605 and 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GT.

Feature	GeForce 605	GeForce 9700M GT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 605) vs 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 9700M GT). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 605	GeForce 9700M GT
DirectX	12 (11_0)+8%	11.1 (FL10_0)
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 605) vs VP3 (GeForce 9700M GT). Decoder: VP5 vs VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 605) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9700M GT).

Feature	GeForce 605	GeForce 9700M GT
Encoder	None	VP3
Decoder	VP5	VP3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the GeForce 9700M GT's 150W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 350W (GeForce 9700M GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce 605	GeForce 9700M GT
TDP	65W-57%	150W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	5.1+132%	2.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 605 came in at $30, while the GeForce 9700M GT launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce 605 was 85% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 1.6 (GeForce 9700M GT) — the GeForce 605 offers 587.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 605 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 605	GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP	$30-85%	$200
Performance per Dollar	11.0+588%	1.6
Codename	GK107	NB9E-GTX
Release	June 5 2012	July 15 2008
Ranking	#837	#825

Search GeForce 605 on Amazon

Search GeForce 9700M GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.