GeForce 605 vs Radeon E6460

NVIDIA

GeForce 605

2012Core: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon E6460

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 605 vs Radeon E6460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon E6460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon E6460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 605

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $120 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 409.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon E6460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

  • 23.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon E6460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 605 instead at 330 vs 324, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 605 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 605 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 409.3% (11.0 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon E6460 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon E6460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 605

The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.

AMD

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).

FeatureGeForce 605Radeon E6460
G3D Mark Score
330+2%
324
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
480+25%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 605 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 605Radeon E6460
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 605 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6460.

FeatureGeForce 605Radeon E6460
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 36.4% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

FeatureGeForce 605Radeon E6460
TDP
65W
45W-31%
Recommended PSU
250W-29%
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
5.1
7.2+41%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 605 came in at $30, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 605 was 80% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 2.2 (Radeon E6460) — the GeForce 605 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 605 (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 605Radeon E6460
MSRP
$30-80%
$150
Performance per Dollar
11.0+400%
2.2
Codename
GK107
Turks
Release
June 5 2012
May 2 2011
Ranking
#837
#923

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.