GeForce 605 vs Radeon R5 310

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 605

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌30% higher power demand at 65W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 50W instead of 65W, a 15W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
63.3% HIGHER MSRP
$49 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (332 vs 330), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 605 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 605 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $19 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $49, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.3% (11.0 vs 6.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 310 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 605

The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce 605) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310).

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score	330	332
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+14%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 605 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 605 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce 605) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce 605 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon R5 310
TDP	65W	50W-23%
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	5.1	6.6+29%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 605 came in at $30, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, GeForce 605 was 38.8% cheaper ($19 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce 605 offers 61.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon R5 310
MSRP	$30-39%	$49
Performance per Dollar	11.0+62%	6.8
Codename	GK107	Weston
Release	June 5 2012	April 18 2017
Ranking	#837	#873

Search GeForce 605 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.