GeForce 605 vs Radeon HD 8310E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon HD 8310E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon HD 8310E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 605

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 61.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8310E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8310E

2010

Why buy it

✅54.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$50 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8310E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (341 vs 330), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 605 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 605 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 61.3% (11.0 vs 6.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 8310E still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 605 vs Radeon HD 8310E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 605

The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon HD 8310E

The Radeon HD 8310E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the Radeon HD 8310E reaches 341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8310E uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8310E). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce 605) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8310E).

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon HD 8310E
G3D Mark Score	330	341+3%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1120+192%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6927 TFLOPS	1.792 TFLOPS+159%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	32 KB	112 KB+250%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 605 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8310E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon HD 8310E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 605 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8310E. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce 605) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8310E) — the Radeon HD 8310E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon HD 8310E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 8310E's 175W — a 91.7% difference. The GeForce 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8310E). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon HD 8310E
TDP	65W-63%	175W
Recommended PSU	250W-29%	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	5.1+168%	1.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 605 came in at $30, while the Radeon HD 8310E launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 605 was 40% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 6.8 (Radeon HD 8310E) — the GeForce 605 offers 61.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 605 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 605	Radeon HD 8310E
MSRP	$30-40%	$50
Performance per Dollar	11.0+62%	6.8
Codename	GK107	Cypress
Release	June 5 2012	February 25 2010
Ranking	#837	#724

Search GeForce 605 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8310E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.