
GeForce 605 vs Radeon HD 7540D

GeForce 605
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7540D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 605 is positioned at rank 115 and the Radeon HD 7540D is on rank 230, so the GeForce 605 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 605
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7540D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7540D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 605.
| Insight | GeForce 605 | Radeon HD 7540D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7540D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7540D holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $30), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 501.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 605 | Radeon HD 7540D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+501.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 605 and Radeon HD 7540D

GeForce 605
The GeForce 605 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $99.

Radeon HD 7540D
The Radeon HD 7540D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 331 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 605 scores 330 and the Radeon HD 7540D reaches 331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 605 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7540D uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 605) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7540D). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce 605) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7540D).
| Feature | GeForce 605 | Radeon HD 7540D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 330 | 331 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1792+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+314% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 448 KB+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 605 | Radeon HD 7540D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce 605) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7540D) — the Radeon HD 7540D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | Radeon HD 7540D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 605 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 7540D's 200W — a 101.9% difference. The GeForce 605 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce 605) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7540D). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | Radeon HD 7540D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-68% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1+200% | 1.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 605 launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 7540D launched at $67 and now averages $5. The Radeon HD 7540D costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.0 (GeForce 605) vs 66.2 (Radeon HD 7540D) — the Radeon HD 7540D offers 501.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 605 | Radeon HD 7540D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-55% | $67 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $5-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.0 | 66.2+502% |
| Codename | GK107 | Tahiti |
| Release | June 5 2012 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #837 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











