
GeForce 9700M GT

GeForce GT 520
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9700M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌239% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 90W.
GeForce GT 520
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $141 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 234.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 150W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9700M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9700M GT
The GeForce 9700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 327 points.

GeForce GT 520
The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9700M GT scores 327 and the GeForce GT 520 reaches 323 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GT is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 520 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 768 (GeForce GT 520).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 327+1% | 323 |
| Architecture | G9x | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 768+243% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9700M GT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 520 carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GT and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 520.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (FL10_0) | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.1+24% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VP3 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs No (GeForce GT 520). Decoder: VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VP3 | No |
| Decoder | VP3 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9700M GT draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 520's 90W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 250W (GeForce GT 520). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 90W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 3.6+64% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9700M GT came in at $200, while the GeForce GT 520 launched at $59. On MSRP, GeForce GT 520 was 70.5% cheaper ($141 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 5.5 (GeForce GT 520) — the GeForce GT 520 offers 243.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 520 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $59-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 5.5+244% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GM206 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | August 20 2015 |
| Ranking | #825 | #425 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














