
GeForce 9700M GT

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9700M GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌135.3% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$85 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
2017Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($85 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 133.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($85 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9700M GT vs GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9700M GT
The GeForce 9700M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 327 points.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 325 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9700M GT scores 327 and the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT reaches 325 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GT is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT uses Pascal, both on 65 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 1,280 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 327 | 325 |
| Architecture | G9x | Pascal |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 1280+471% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9700M GT and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (FL10_0)+11% | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VP3 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs None (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT). Decoder: VP3 vs PureVideo VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VP3 | None |
| Decoder | VP3 | PureVideo VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9700M GT draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT's 120W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 350W (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 120W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 2.7+23% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9700M GT came in at $200, while the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT launched at $85. On MSRP, GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT was 57.5% cheaper ($115 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (GeForce 9700M GT) vs 3.8 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) — the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT offers 137.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9700M GT | GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $85-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 3.8+137% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GP106 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | December 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #825 | #289 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














