GeForce 9700M GTS
VS
FirePro V3800

GeForce 9700M GTS vs FirePro V3800

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz
VS

FirePro V3800

2010Core: 690 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3800

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
94%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
94%
#253
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5933%
#268
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
100%
#269
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
99%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
99%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
98%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
97%
#274
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
96%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
94%
#277
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
94%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
91%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
89%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
89%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

InsightGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V3800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9700M GTS and FirePro V3800

NVIDIA

GeForce 9700M GTS

The GeForce 9700M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

AMD

FirePro V3800

The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9700M GTS scores 312 and the FirePro V3800 reaches 321 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9700M GTS is built on G9x while the FirePro V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 800 (FirePro V3800).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
G3D Mark Score
312
321+3%
Architecture
G9x
TeraScale 2
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
224
800+257%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9700M GTS comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V3800 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 11.2 (FirePro V3800). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.2
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs None (FirePro V3800). Decoder: VP2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
VP2
UVD 2.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9700M GTS draws 150W versus the FirePro V3800's 74W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 350W (FirePro V3800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 80.

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
TDP
150W
74W-51%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
90
80-11%
Perf/Watt
2.1
4.3+105%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 9700M GTS launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The GeForce 9700M GTS costs 100+% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 9700M GTS) vs 26.8 (FirePro V3800) — the GeForce 9700M GTS offers Infinity% better value. The FirePro V3800 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9700M GTSFirePro V3800
MSRP
$0-100%
$129
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$12
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
26.8
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Juniper
Release
July 15 2008
April 26 2010
Ranking
#825
#780