
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
2022Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 180W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌32.4% longer card at 229mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅10724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 229mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌620% higher power demand at 180W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 29500%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 10,064+29500% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+88% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1733 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 64 | 160+150% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+113% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 6 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5+114% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 151.2% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-86% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 55.9+3893% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 Ultra (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 40.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #387 | #137 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














