
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 23044.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-23044.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+23044.1%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+1500%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 23044.1%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 7,869+23044% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+59% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1665 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+127% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 4 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 104.9+7393% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 104.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU117 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #387 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















