GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 23044.1%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 7,869+23044% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+59% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1665 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+127% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 4 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 104.9+7393% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 Ultra (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 52.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU117 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #387 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce GTX 1650
