
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 160W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅11874.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌540% higher power demand at 160W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 41411.8%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 64 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 14,114+41412% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+7% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1680 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+5% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 30+88% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 240+275% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 6 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 88.2+6200% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 Ultra (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 40.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU106 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #387 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














