CPU
GPU
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 65111.8% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-65111.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+65111.8%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 65111.8%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 64 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 22,172+65112% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888+188% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+329% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1725 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 40 | 96+140% |
| TMUs | 64 | 184+188% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 5.8 MB+190% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 46+188% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 184+188% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 8 GB+3100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 159.2% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 100.8+7100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 110.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA104 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #387 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce RTX 3070
