GeForce G200 vs GeForce G105M
GeForce G200
Popular choices:
GeForce G105M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G200 is positioned at rank 357 and the GeForce G105M is on rank 144, so the GeForce G105M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G105M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce G200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G105M.
| Insight | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce G200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G200 and GeForce G105M
GeForce G200
The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.
GeForce G105M
The GeForce G105M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 133 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G200 scores 136 and the GeForce G105M reaches 133 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce G105M uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G200) vs 640 (GeForce G105M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G200) vs 1.862 TFLOPS (GeForce G105M). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1392 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 136+2% | 133 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 1.862 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+5% | 1392 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 240 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G200) vs 1 MB (GeForce G105M) — the GeForce G105M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G200) vs 10.1 (GeForce G105M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G200) vs No (GeForce G105M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce G200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G105M).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G200 draws 30W versus the GeForce G105M's 60W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce G200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G200) vs 350W (GeForce G105M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-50% | 60W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5+105% | 2.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce G200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce G105M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | GP108 | GP107 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #641 | #443 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce G200 and GeForce G105M
