CPU
GPU
GeForce Go 6800
Popular choices:
GeForce 8400M G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6800 is positioned at rank 277 and the GeForce 8400M G is on rank 635, so the GeForce Go 6800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400M G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8400M G.
| Insight | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6800 and GeForce 8400M G
GeForce Go 6800
The GeForce Go 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $499.
GeForce 8400M G
The GeForce 8400M G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 6800 scores 106 and the GeForce 8400M G reaches 105 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6800 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 8400M G uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 6800) vs 384 (GeForce 8400M G). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6800) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M G). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 106 | 105 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS+277% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1058 MHz | 1124 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+700% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 6800) vs 1 MB (GeForce 8400M G) — the GeForce 8400M G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6800) vs 11.1 (GeForce 8400M G). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.1+11% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6800) vs PureVideo HD (GeForce 8400M G). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400M G).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6800 draws 195W versus the GeForce 8400M G's 33W — a 142.1% difference. The GeForce 8400M G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6800) vs 350W (GeForce 8400M G). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W | 33W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 3.2+540% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400M G is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | GeForce 8400M G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM108 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #410 | #854 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 6800 and GeForce 8400M G
