G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs GeForce GT 520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs GeForce GT 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

2017

Why buy it

✅3.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
44.1% HIGHER MSRP
$85 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($85 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 90W.

GeForce GT 520

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $26 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 120W, a 30W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 168mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (325 vs 323), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $26 cheaper on MSRP at $59 vs $85, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 43.2% (5.5 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs GeForce GT 520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 325 points.

GeForce GT 520

The GeForce GT 520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT scores 325 and the GeForce GT 520 reaches 323 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is built on Pascal while the GeForce GT 520 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 768 (GeForce GT 520). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1188 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT	GeForce GT 520
G3D Mark Score	325	323
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.375 TFLOPS+140%	1.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1709 MHz+44%	1188 MHz
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L1 Cache	480 KB+67%	288 KB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+25%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT	GeForce GT 520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 520 carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 520. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 1 MB (GeForce GT 520) — the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT	GeForce GT 520
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1.25 MB+25%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT	GeForce GT 520
DirectX	10.0	11.0+10%
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	3.3	4.1+24%
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs No (GeForce GT 520). Decoder: PureVideo VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520).

Feature	GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT	GeForce GT 520
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo VP2	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT draws 120W versus the GeForce GT 520's 90W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GT 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 250W (GeForce GT 520). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT	GeForce GT 520
TDP	120W	90W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	None	None
Length	168mm	145mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75	65°C-13%
Perf/Watt	2.7	3.6+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT came in at $85, while the GeForce GT 520 launched at $59. On MSRP, GeForce GT 520 was 30.6% cheaper ($26 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 5.5 (GeForce GT 520) — the GeForce GT 520 offers 44.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT	GeForce GT 520
MSRP	$85	$59-31%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	5.5+45%
Codename	GP106	GM206
Release	December 26 2017	August 20 2015
Ranking	#289	#425

Search GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.