GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon E6460

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

2017Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1709 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon E6460

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon E6460 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon E6460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon E6460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

2017

Why buy it

  • 19.2% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $65 less on MSRP ($85 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 77% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($85 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 76.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $150 MSRPvs$85 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.2% in average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (325 vs 324), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $65 cheaper on MSRP at $85 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 77% (3.8 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon E6460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 325 points.

AMD

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT scores 325 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is built on Pascal while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon E6460
G3D Mark Score
325
324
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 2
Process Node
16 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1280+167%
480
ROPs
40+400%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon E6460
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT and 64-bit on the Radeon E6460.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon E6460
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT draws 120W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon E6460
TDP
120W
45W-63%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
2.7
7.2+167%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT came in at $85, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT was 43.3% cheaper ($65 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 2.2 (Radeon E6460) — the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT offers 72.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon E6460
MSRP
$85-43%
$150
Performance per Dollar
3.8+73%
2.2
Codename
GP106
Turks
Release
December 26 2017
May 2 2011
Ranking
#289
#923

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.