GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon R5 310

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

2017Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1709 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 310

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon R5 310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon R5 310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

2017

Why buy it

  • 41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 73.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $85 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($85 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $36 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
  • Delivers 77.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 310 instead at 332 vs 325, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $36 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $85, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 77.2% (6.8 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 325 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT scores 325 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT is built on Pascal while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score
325
332+2%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280+233%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.375 TFLOPS+456%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1709 MHz+67%
1024 MHz
ROPs
40+400%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L1 Cache
480 KB+400%
96 KB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+862%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 310) — the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB+862%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT draws 120W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon R5 310
TDP
120W
50W-58%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
2.7
6.6+144%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT came in at $85, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 310 was 42.4% cheaper ($36 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.8 (GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 78.9% better value.

FeatureGeForce GT 120 / 9500 GTRadeon R5 310
MSRP
$85
$49-42%
Performance per Dollar
3.8
6.8+79%
Codename
GP106
Weston
Release
December 26 2017
April 18 2017
Ranking
#289
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.