GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon HD 6320

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6320

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon HD 6320 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon HD 6320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon HD 6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130M

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 186W, a 156W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6320

2011

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 520% higher power demand at 186W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6320 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (147 vs 145), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 130M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 130M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon HD 6320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320

The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130M scores 145 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130M is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130M) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon HD 6320
G3D Mark Score
145
147+1%
Architecture
Pascal
TeraScale 3
Process Node
14 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+70%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
144 KB
320 KB+122%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 130M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon HD 6320
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6320 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 130M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6320.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon HD 6320
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon HD 6320
DirectX
10.1
11.2+11%
OpenGL
3.3
4.5+36%
Max Displays
1
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 130M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6320). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130M) vs H.264,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6320).

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon HD 6320
Encoder
No
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 144.4% difference. The GeForce GT 130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon HD 6320
TDP
30W-84%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
4.8+500%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 130M (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon HD 6320
MSRP
$30
Codename
GP108
Cayman
Release
May 17 2017
December 1 2011
Ranking
#641
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.