GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon X1900 GT

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1900 GT

2022Core: 1387 MHzBoost: 2394 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon X1900 GT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon X1900 GT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon X1900 GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 130M

2017

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 300W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon X1900 GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Radeon X1900 GT

2022

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 900% higher power demand at 300W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1900 GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (146 vs 145), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1900 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 84 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1900 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 130M vs Radeon X1900 GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 130M

The GeForce GT 130M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon X1900 GT

The Radeon X1900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 146 points. Launch price was $899.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 130M scores 145 and the Radeon X1900 GT reaches 146 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 130M is built on Pascal while the Radeon X1900 GT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 130M) vs 5,376 (Radeon X1900 GT). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130M) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon X1900 GT). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2394 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon X1900 GT
G3D Mark Score
145
146
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384
5376+1300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS
51.48 TFLOPS+4468%
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
2394 MHz+63%
ROPs
16
192+1100%
TMUs
24
336+1300%
L1 Cache
0.14 MB
3 MB+2043%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
6 MB+1100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 130M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1900 GT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon X1900 GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 130M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1900 GT carries 256 MB. GeForce GT 130M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 130M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1900 GT. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 130M) vs 6 MB (Radeon X1900 GT) — the Radeon X1900 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon X1900 GT
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+300%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
6 MB+1100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 130M draws 30W versus the Radeon X1900 GT's 300W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce GT 130M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 130M) vs 350W (Radeon X1900 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon X1900 GT
TDP
30W-90%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
4.8+860%
0.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1900 GT (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce GT 130MRadeon X1900 GT
MSRP
$299
Codename
GP108
Navi 31
Release
May 17 2017
November 3 2022
Ranking
#641
#21

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.