GeForce GT 625M vs GeForce GT 240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 625M is positioned at rank 219 and the GeForce GT 240 is on rank 197, so the GeForce GT 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625M

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

93%

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

89%

#209

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

448%

#211

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

406%

#212

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

405%

#216

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

368%

#217

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

366%

#219

GeForce GT 625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#221

Radeon HD 6550A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

97%

#222

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

96%

#224

GeForce GT 640M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

94%

#228

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

MSRP: $149|Avg: $40

92%

#230

Maxwell GPU Surface Book

MSRP: $150|Avg: $75

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 240

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1172%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1126%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

1113%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1111%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1109%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1102%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1088%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1084%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1074%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1071%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1058%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1056%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1037%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1037%

#96

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

100%

#182

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1292%

#197

GeForce GT 240

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

100%

#199

GeForce GT 705

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

100%

#200

Radeon HD 7340

MSRP: $25|Avg: $5

99%

#201

GeForce GT 320

MSRP: $79|Avg: $30

96%

#202

Radeon HD 5570

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

96%

#203

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#204

Radeon HD 7580D

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

95%

#205

Radeon HD 7470

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

93%

#206

Radeon R5 A240

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

93%

#207

Radeon HD 6550D

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

92%

#208

Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $67

92%

#209

Radeon R5 235X

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

91%

#210

Radeon R7 A360

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

91%

#211

Radeon HD 7290

MSRP: $20|Avg: $5

90%

#212

Radeon HD 8210

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 240 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 625M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 625M	GeForce GT 240
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 240 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 625M Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 240 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 625M and GeForce GT 240

GeForce GT 625M

The GeForce GT 625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 485 points.

GeForce GT 240

The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 625M scores 485 and the GeForce GT 240 reaches 495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 240 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 625M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 240). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625M) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240).

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	GeForce GT 240
G3D Mark Score	485	495+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	0.7626 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	GeForce GT 240
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 625M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 240 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 625M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	GeForce GT 240
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 625M) vs 10.1 (GeForce GT 240). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	GeForce GT 240
DirectX	11.0+9%	10.1
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	4.0+21%	3.3
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 625M) vs None (GeForce GT 240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 625M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 240).

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	GeForce GT 240
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 625M draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 240's 64W — a 34.9% difference. The GeForce GT 625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 625M) vs 300W (GeForce GT 240). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	GeForce GT 240
TDP	45W-30%	64W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	70-7%
Perf/Watt	10.8+40%	7.7