
GeForce GT 645M

Radeon 620
GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon 620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon 620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon 620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 645M
2012Why buy it
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 32W instead of 50W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon 620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Radeon 620
2019Why buy it
- β 5.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β GeForce GT 645M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 620 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- β56.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 32W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon 620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 645M
The GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 945 points.

Radeon 620
The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 645M scores 945 and the Radeon 620 reaches 954 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 645M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 620 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 645M) vs 384 (Radeon 620). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 645M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620).
| Feature | GeForce GT 645M | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 945 | 954 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5445 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+44% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 645M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 645M | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 645M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 620 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 645M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 645M and 128-bit on the Radeon 620. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 645M) vs 128 KB (Radeon 620) β the GeForce GT 645M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 645M | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 645M draws 32W versus the Radeon 620's 50W β a 43.9% difference. The GeForce GT 645M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 645M) vs 350W (Radeon 620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 645M | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 32W-36% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 29.5+54% | 19.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 620 (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 645M | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $100 |
| Codename | GK107 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | October 1 2012 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #903 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















