GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R7 M445

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 645M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M445

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 920 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R7 M445 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R7 M445 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R7 M445: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 645M

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M445 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 113.3% higher power demand at 32W vs 15W.

Radeon R7 M445

2016

Why buy it

  • 2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 32W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M445 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (947 vs 945), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 645M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M445 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M445 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 645M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R7 M445 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 645M

The GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 945 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M445

The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 645M scores 945 and the Radeon R7 M445 reaches 947 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 645M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M445 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 645M) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M445). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 645M) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445).

FeatureGeForce GT 645MRadeon R7 M445
G3D Mark Score
945
947
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5445 TFLOPS
0.5888 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+60%
20
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 645M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M445 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 645MRadeon R7 M445
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 645M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M445 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 645M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 645M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M445. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 645M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M445) — the GeForce GT 645M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 645MRadeon R7 M445
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 645M draws 32W versus the Radeon R7 M445's 15W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 645M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M445). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GT 645MRadeon R7 M445
TDP
32W
15W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
29.5
63.1+114%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M445 (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 645MRadeon R7 M445
MSRP
$250
Codename
GK107
Meso
Release
October 1 2012
May 15 2016
Ranking
#903
#899

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.