GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

GeForce GT 645M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 645M

945

+2.6%

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

300

921

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 645M is positioned at rank 80 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is on rank 180, so the GeForce GT 645M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 645M

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

94%

#70

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

230%

#72

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

208%

#73

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

208%

#77

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

189%

#78

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

188%

#80

GeForce GT 645M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#82

Arc 7-Core iGPU

MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A

99%

#87

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

96%

#92

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

94%

#95

GeForce GT 555M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

97%

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

95%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

93%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

92%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

90%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

88%

#165

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2228%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

100%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

99%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

97%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

96%

#185

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

96%

#186

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

95%

#188

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

94%

#190

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

92%

#191

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

92%

#193

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is significantly newer (2025 vs 2012). The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 645M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 645M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E.

Insight	GeForce GT 645M	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 645M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 645M Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 645M and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

GeForce GT 645M

The GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 945 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 645M scores 945 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 645M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 645M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 645M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E).

Feature	GeForce GT 645M	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
G3D Mark Score	945+3%	921
Architecture	Kepler	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+8686%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	32	256+700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 645M	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 645M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 645M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 645M) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 645M	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 645M draws 32W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W — a 161.4% difference. The GeForce GT 645M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 645M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.