GeForce GT 735M vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 735M

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 735M vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 735M vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 735M vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 735M

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4700 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008

Why buy it

  • 41.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (676 vs 655), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 735M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 4700 X2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 735M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 735M vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 735M

The GeForce GT 735M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4700 X2

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 735M scores 655 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 735M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 735M) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 735M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).

FeatureGeForce GT 735MQuadro FX 4700 X2
G3D Mark Score
655
676+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS+63%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 735M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 735MQuadro FX 4700 X2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 735M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 735M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 735M) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GT 735M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 735MQuadro FX 4700 X2
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 735M draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GT 735M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 735M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 735MQuadro FX 4700 X2
TDP
50W-67%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
13.1+191%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 735M (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 735MQuadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP
$2999
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
June 25 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#726
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.