FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 735M

FirePro M7740

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 735M

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 735M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 735M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M7740

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GT 735M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M7740 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (665 vs 655), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M7740 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M7740 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro M7740 vs GeForce GT 735M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M7740

The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 735M

The GeForce GT 735M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M7740 scores 665 and the GeForce GT 735M reaches 655 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M7740 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 735M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M7740) vs 384 (GeForce GT 735M). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740) vs 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 735M).

FeatureFirePro M7740GeForce GT 735M
G3D Mark Score
665+2%
655
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
0.7526 TFLOPS+9%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
128 KB+300%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 735M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M7740 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro M7740GeForce GT 735M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M7740 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 735M carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 735M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M7740 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 735M.

FeatureFirePro M7740GeForce GT 735M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro M7740) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 735M). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureFirePro M7740GeForce GT 735M
DirectX
10.1
11.0+9%
Vulkan
None
1.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.2+27%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro M7740) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 735M). Decoder: UVD 2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 735M).

FeatureFirePro M7740GeForce GT 735M
Encoder
None
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
UVD 2
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M7740 draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 735M's 50W — a 41% difference. The FirePro M7740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M7740) vs 350W (GeForce GT 735M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureFirePro M7740GeForce GT 735M
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
20.2+54%
13.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 735M (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M7740GeForce GT 735M
MSRP
$500
Codename
Chelsea
GK107
Release
June 27 2012
June 25 2013
Ranking
#752
#726

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.