GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6990M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6990M

2011

Why buy it

✅166.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6990M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 166.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition instead at 3,311 vs 3,264, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6990M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6990M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 926 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Radeon HD 6990M

The Radeon HD 6990M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition scores 3,311 and the Radeon HD 6990M reaches 3,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6990M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 6990M). Raw compute: 0.7112 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 1.602 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6990M).

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon HD 6990M
G3D Mark Score	3,311+1%	3,264
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1120+192%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7112 TFLOPS	1.602 TFLOPS+125%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	32 KB	224 KB+600%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6990M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon HD 6990M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and System on the Radeon HD 6990M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6990M) — the Radeon HD 6990M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon HD 6990M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6990M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon HD 6990M
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	66.2+103%	32.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition	Radeon HD 6990M
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	GK107	Blackcomb
Release	November 8 2013	July 12 2011
Ranking	#735	#691

Search GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6990M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.