GeForce GT 750M vs Tesla M2070-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 750M is positioned at rank 158 and the Tesla M2070-Q is on rank 398, so the GeForce GT 750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

96%

#148

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

326%

#150

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

296%

#151

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

295%

#155

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

268%

#156

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

266%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

100%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

100%

#172

GeForce GT 540M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q

#381

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

61554%

#396

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

100%

#397

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

100%

#398

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

100%

#399

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

96%

#400

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

96%

#401

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

92%

#402

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

83%

#404

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

83%

#405

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

75%

#407

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

71%

#408

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

67%

#409

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

67%

#411

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070-Q.

Insight	GeForce GT 750M	Tesla M2070-Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GT 750M	Tesla M2070-Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 750M Benchmark Check

Tesla M2070-Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 750M and Tesla M2070-Q

GeForce GT 750M

The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.

Tesla M2070-Q

The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 750M scores 1,332 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 750M is built on Kepler while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 750M) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Tesla M2070-Q
G3D Mark Score	1,332+2%	1,306
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	448+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7427 TFLOPS	1.028 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	32 KB	896 KB+2700%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Tesla M2070-Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 750M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 750M) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Tesla M2070-Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 750M draws 50W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GT 750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 750M) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 750M	Tesla M2070-Q
TDP	50W-78%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	26.6+359%	5.8

💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the GeForce GT 750M offers 1.9% better value. The GeForce GT 750M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).