
GeForce GTS 250M

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce GTS 250M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 250M vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 250M vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 250M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 106W instead of 160W, a 54W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅1408.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50.9% higher power demand at 160W vs 106W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 250M vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 250M
The GeForce GTS 250M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 520 points. Launch price was $129.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTS 250M scores 520 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 2614.2%. The GeForce GTS 250M is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 520 | 14,114+2614% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1920+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+973% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 120+275% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1.9 MB+660% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTS 250M is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250M and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 6 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+8% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 250M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 250M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250M draws 106W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 40.6% difference. The GeForce GTS 250M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTS 250M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-34% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 72-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 88.2+1700% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250M | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $349 |
| Codename | GF106 | TU106 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #791 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














