
GeForce GTS 350M vs GeForce 7900 GTX

GeForce GTS 350M
Popular choices:

GeForce 7900 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 350M is positioned at rank 162 and the GeForce 7900 GTX is on rank 711, so the GeForce GTS 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 350M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7900 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 7900 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 7900 GTX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 350M and GeForce 7900 GTX

GeForce GTS 350M
The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

GeForce 7900 GTX
The GeForce 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 350M scores 381 and the GeForce 7900 GTX reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 350M is built on Fermi while the GeForce 7900 GTX uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 224 (GeForce 7900 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381 | 388+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | G9x |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 224+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 350M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7900 GTX has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7900 GTX). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1)+23% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs None (GeForce 7900 GTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce 7900 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo VP1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 350M draws 106W versus the GeForce 7900 GTX's 150W — a 34.4% difference. The GeForce GTS 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 350W (GeForce 7900 GTX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-29% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+38% | 2.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTS 350M is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | GF106 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | September 13 2010 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #791 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















