GeForce GTS 350M
VS
GeForce 7900 GTX

GeForce GTS 350M vs GeForce 7900 GTX

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

2010Core: 783 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 7900 GTX

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 350M is positioned at rank 162 and the GeForce 7900 GTX is on rank 711, so the GeForce GTS 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 350M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
952%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
915%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
904%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
902%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
901%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
895%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
884%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
881%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
873%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
870%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
860%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
858%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
843%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
842%
#90
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $4086.44
98%
#91
Radeon Ryzen 5 150
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
97%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
95%
#147
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1050%
#162
GeForce GTS 350M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#164
99%
#165
Radeon HD 6520G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
98%
#166
GeForce GT 545
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
98%
#167
Radeon HD 8470D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#170
GeForce GT 340
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#171
GeForce GT 230
MSRP: $44|Avg: $44
96%
#172
Radeon HD 6670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
96%
#175
Radeon R5 420
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
94%
#177
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7900 GTX

#701
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
13919%
#703
12618%
#704
12585%
#708
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
11444%
#709
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
11365%
#711
GeForce 7900 GTX
MSRP: $499|Avg: $40
100%
#712
GeForce 6800 GS
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
99%
#713
MOBILITY RADEON 9600
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#714
GeForce 6150
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
94%
#715
RADEON E4690
MSRP: $558|Avg: $558
94%
#716
MOBILITY RADEON X300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
87%
#717
MOBILITY RADEON X700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
86%
#718
Mobility Radeon HD 4225
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
85%
#719
RADEON X800 SE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
83%
#720
MOBILITY RADEON 9700
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
71%
#721
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
65%
#722
GeForce 7800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
58%
#723
RADEON 9600SE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $65
54%
#724
Radeon X1200
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
53%
#725
Radeon 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
51%
#726
GeForce 6800
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
49%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 7900 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 7900 GTX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 350M and GeForce 7900 GTX

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7900 GTX

The GeForce 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 350M scores 381 and the GeForce 7900 GTX reaches 388 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 350M is built on Fermi while the GeForce 7900 GTX uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 224 (GeForce 7900 GTX).

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
G3D Mark Score
381
388+2%
Architecture
Fermi
G9x
Process Node
40 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
192
224+17%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 350M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7900 GTX has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7900 GTX). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)+23%
9.0c
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs None (GeForce 7900 GTX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce 7900 GTX).

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo VP1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 350M draws 106W versus the GeForce 7900 GTX's 150W — a 34.4% difference. The GeForce GTS 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 350W (GeForce 7900 GTX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
TDP
106W-29%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80-6%
Perf/Watt
3.6+38%
2.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTS 350M is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTS 350MGeForce 7900 GTX
MSRP
$499
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
GF106
NB9E-GTX
Release
September 13 2010
July 15 2008
Ranking
#791
#825