CPU
GPU
GeForce GTS 350M
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 350M is positioned at rank 162 and the GeForce GT 330 is on rank 260, so the GeForce GTS 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 350M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 330 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce GT 330 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 350M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTS 350M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 330 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 350M and GeForce GT 330
GeForce GTS 350M
The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.
GeForce GT 330
The GeForce GT 330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 393 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 350M scores 381 and the GeForce GT 330 reaches 393 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 350M is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 330 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 330). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 381 | 393+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+87% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+78% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 350M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 330 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTS 350M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 330) — the GeForce GT 330 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 330). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 350M) vs PureVideo HD (GeForce GT 330). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTS 350M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 330).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 350M draws 106W versus the GeForce GT 330's 30W — a 111.8% difference. The GeForce GT 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 350M) vs 300W (GeForce GT 330). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 30W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | — | 175mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6 | 13.1+264% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 330 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 350M | GeForce GT 330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | GF106 | GP108 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #791 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 350M and GeForce GT 330
