GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs FirePro W7000 Adapter
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
FirePro W7000 Adapter
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is positioned at rank 13 and the FirePro W7000 Adapter is on rank 219, so the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2025 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W7000 Adapter lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro W7000 Adapter.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $50 for the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile), it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 227.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+227.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and FirePro W7000 Adapter
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.
FirePro W7000 Adapter
The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the FirePro W7000 Adapter reaches 4,383 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the FirePro W7000 Adapter uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,463+2% | 4,383 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+180% | 1280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-11% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.3+206% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 227.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | FirePro W7000 Adapter |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.3 | 292.2+227% |
| Codename | GN22-X2 | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 2 2025 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #477 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and FirePro W7000 Adapter
