
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs Arc A350M

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Arc A350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is positioned at rank 13 and the Arc A350M is on rank 86, so the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar Arc A350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Arc A350M

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.

Arc A350M
The Arc A350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the Arc A350M reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Arc A350M uses Generation 12.7, both on 3 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 768 (Arc A350M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,463 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+367% | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A350M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs Intel Media Engine (Arc A350M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs Intel Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A350M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | Intel Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | Intel Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Arc A350M's 25W — a 66.7% difference. The Arc A350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 350W (Arc A350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 25W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 89.3 | 180.0+102% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc A350M |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | GN22-X2 | DG2-128 |
| Release | January 2 2025 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #418 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















