CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is positioned at rank 13 and the Arc Graphics 140T is on rank 330, so the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 140T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell (2024−2025) (3nm) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 495.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+495.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Arc Graphics 140T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,463 | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 3584+44700% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.3 | 128.6+44% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 89.3 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 495.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $350 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-83% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.3+495% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GN22-X2 | — |
| Release | January 2 2025 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #409 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Arc Graphics 140T
