
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,918 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+100.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,918 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 100.9%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,918 | 11,892+101% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2560+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+195% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz | 1755 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 88.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-62% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 118.4+29% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA106 |
| Release | April 23 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #324 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













