
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank #15 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 760 Ti

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,307 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 5,310 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti reaches 5,307 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Boost clocks: 1417 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,310 | 5,307 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2880+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.177 TFLOPS | 5.345 TFLOPS+146% |
| Boost Clock | 1417 MHz+53% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+20% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 760 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 192 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.8+234% | 21.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $249 |
| Codename | GP107 | GK110B |
| Release | January 3 2018 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #429 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















