
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

L2
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs L2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs L2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs L2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs L2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 5,310 and the L2 reaches 5,467 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 1417 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,310 | 5,467+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 11776+1433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.177 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+2626% |
| Boost Clock | 1417 MHz | 2520 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 48 | 368+667% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 11.5 MB+4007% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 96 MB+9500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The L2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the L2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 96 MB+9500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the L2's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-73% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.8+256% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is L2 (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Codename | GP107 | AD102 |
| Release | January 3 2018 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #429 | #189 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















